Categories: Knee ligaments

Coach the coach, make ACL injury prevention programs stick!

Coach training improves adherence to anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention programs: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine

Ling, Daphne I; Boyle, Caroline; Schneider, Brandon; Janosky, Joseph; Childservant, James; Marx, Robert G. Clin J Sport Med. July 2022 – Part 32 – Number 4 – p. 348-354. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000936

Free article freely available

Take home message

Coaches who received education about anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury prevention were more likely to include it in their warm-up. Personal training sessions increased the use of proper alignment cues and the incorporation of a complete prevention program.

Background

Neuromuscular training programs can reduce an athlete’s chance of an ACL injury and can be incorporated as a simple warm-up. However, few coaches use warm-up programs for injury prevention.

Study aim

Ling and colleagues completed a cluster randomized controlled trial to investigate whether live educational training for coaches with take-home documents led to better adherence to a neuromuscular training program for their teams than coaches who only received program information via email received.

Methods

The authors recruited coaches via email to athletic directors at high schools with which the authors’ institution had ties. The authors excluded schools that had previously implemented a neuromuscular training warm-up program. High schools interested in participating in the study were randomized to receive live education for coaches with reference documents or educational documents only. Coaches from schools randomized to the intervention attended a live education session and received a reference video and follow-up documents for a series of neuromuscular training warm-up routines (beginner to elite) containing 7-10 exercises. Coaches from schools in the control group only received the documents in an email. Trained data collectors observed all teams 2-3 times per week during both practices and games. They checked that the coaches performed the neuromuscular training exercises, provided instructions on the correct execution and gave the correct instructions for the technique.

Results

The authors randomized 8 high schools, including 21 teams. Over two seasons, the data collectors observed 399 practices or games and 2,579 practices. Coaches in the intervention group used ~7 exercises per session, while coaches in the control group used only ~6 exercises. More coaches in the intervention completed a full neuromuscular training warm-up program and provided prompts to correct incorrect techniques than coaches who only received the documents.

Viewpoints

As I suspect, the findings of this study support training coaches on proper techniques and drills in a live format. The authors used a combination of lectures and practical skills training during a 1-hour teaching session. Completing this educational session allowed coaches to ask questions, gain clarity and better understand the need to implement the program properly throughout the season. Having data collectors on site regularly throughout the seasons may have made coaches more compliant. However, coaches did not know when the data collectors would be present, making the data valid because coaches did not perform the prevention exercises in a performative manner only because they believed they were being watched. It would be interesting to see if this educational session could help coaches in more high schools and if other teachers could effectively deliver this educational session.

Clinical implications

Clinicians should organize educational workshops for coaches to help them implement proven ACL injury prevention programs as part of their warm-up routine. These workshops can be provided by the physician, another local health care professional, or a coach with experience using these programs.

Questions for discussion

Would the implementation of exercises be higher if coaches could choose from a group of useful exercises for their team, thereby increasing “buy-in”?

Would governing bodies that approve programs and recommend training of coaches in these programs specific to their sport increase adherence and appropriate implementation or discourage participation?

Written by Shelly Fetchen DiCesaro
Reviewed by Jeffrey Driban

related posts

Sports injury prevention programs increase a player’s fortunes
Back-to-school injury prevention programs
Forget about 7 minutes of Abs. What about the 10-minute lower extremity injury prevention program?

Source link

Mokhtar

Share
Published by
Mokhtar

Recent Posts

Iliotibial Band Syndrome: Causes, Symptoms, and Prevention

Introduction If you're an athlete or someone who leads an active lifestyle, you've likely heard…

2 months ago

Expert Advice on Preventing and Managing Knee Pain

Key Takeaways Regular exercise and maintaining a healthy weight are crucial for knee health Proper…

2 months ago

Acute Knee Pain After Running

Ever finished a run and felt your knee throbbing? You're not alone. Many athletes face…

3 months ago

Protecting Your Knees: A Weight Lifter’s Comprehensive Guide to Pain-Free Performance

https://youtu.be/YRrppL1WuCw Introduction As a weight lifter, you're no stranger to pushing your body to its…

3 months ago

The Best Knee Braces for Hiking and Outdoor Activities

Ever wondered why some hikers seem to move easily on tough trails while others find…

4 months ago

Knee Cartilage Repair Options for Active Individuals

Are you an active person dealing with knee pain that stops you from doing what…

4 months ago