Category: Knee ligaments

  • COVID-19 pandemic cancellations have taken a heavy toll on teen athletes, whose mental and physical health improved significantly after sports resumed, research shows

    COVID-19 pandemic cancellations have taken a heavy toll on teen athletes, whose mental and physical health improved significantly after sports resumed, research shows

    High rates of depression and anxiety among adolescent athletes whose sports were canceled during the COVID-19 pandemic improved significantly a year later when they were able to return to sports, according to new research.

    The author of an abstract, “The Influence of Return to Sport on Mental Health, Physical Activity and Quality of Life Among Adolescent Athletes During COVID-19,” will present his findings at the AAP 2022 National Conference and Exhibition in Anaheim, CA.

    “Organized sports participation has been shown for decades to have significant physical and mental health benefits for adolescents, but the COVID-19 pandemic has made this even clearer,” said author Drew Watson, MD, MS, team physician for athletics from the University of Wisconsin.

    “The cessation of sports during the early pandemic was associated with reduced physical activity and quality of life, as well as surprisingly high levels of anxiety and depression. Although the return to sport has been associated with major improvements in physical activity, quality of life and mental health, we are still seeing higher levels of anxiety and depression than before COVID-19, suggesting this will be a crucial priority in the coming years to stay.”

    According to the summary, a total of 17,421 teens nationwide completed surveys in May 2020, including information on demographics and sports participation, following cancellations of sporting events related to COVID-19 and following their return to sports in May 2021.

    When sports were stopped, adolescent athletes reported low levels of physical activity, poor quality of life, and high rates of anxiety and depression. A year later, the athletes who were able to return to sports reported a significant increase in physical activity and quality of life. The percentage of adolescents reporting moderate to severe anxiety or depression fell by about half.

    Dr. Watson suggests that the opportunity to participate in organized sports can have dramatic benefits for adolescents’ quality of life and mental health.

    Source link

  • Help reduce injuries by having a fun and fit warm-up with FIFA 11+ Kids

    Help reduce injuries by having a fun and fit warm-up with FIFA 11+ Kids

    The FIFA 11+ Kids Injury Prevention Program reduces injuries among male football players: a clustered randomized controlled trial.

    Al Attar WSA, Bizzini M, Alzahrani H, Alarifi S, Ghulam H, Alyami M, Alzhrani M, Sanders RH. Sports Health. July 28, 2022: 19417381221109224. doi: 10.1177/19417381221109224. E-publishing prior to printing. PMID: 35903029.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35903029/

    Take home message

    Footballing children who completed the FIFA 11+ Kids program suffered fewer injuries than those who completed the normal warm-up.

    Background

    Children under the age of 14 sustain almost 44% of all football injuries. Warm-up programs for injury prevention could reduce the number of injuries in this population and future health care costs. However, we know little about the effectiveness of these programs in youth football.

    Study aim

    The authors evaluated the effect of the FIFA 11+ Kids injury prevention program on reducing the incidence of injuries among male Saudi Arabian football players aged 7 to 13 years.

    Methods

    The authors conducted a cluster randomized control trial to assess the effect of the 11+ Kids program on reducing injuries in 7- to 13-year-old football players over 1 season (August 2018 – January 2019). The authors sent recruitment letters to 100 male soccer teams (825 athletes) participating in the Saudi Federation of Sports Medicine and Saudi Soccer Federation soccer teams. In response, 88 teams (740 players) agreed and completed the study. The authors randomized 45 soccer teams into the 11+ Kids program (377 athletes). The 11+ Kids program consisted of a 15-20 minute warm-up (7 exercises; 5 levels; focused on balance, core stability and optimization of falling technique) to be performed twice a week instead of a regular warm-up . The control group (43 teams, 363 athletes) performed their regular warm-up regimen, which was defined as basic exercises performed before a match or training to prepare the player for vigorous physical activity. The authors defined an injury as one that prevented a player from fully participating in the next match or training session.

    Results

    The soccer players who completed the 11+ Kids program had ~57% fewer injuries than players who performed a traditional warm-up. The benefit of the 11+ Kids program appears to apply to contact, non-contact and overuse injuries. The authors provide a detailed overview of the different types of injuries, but in many of them only a few athletes (<5 athletes) had an injury, making it difficult to interpret.

    Viewpoints

    Overall, athletes who completed the 11+ Kids program suffered 57% fewer injuries than the control group, demonstrating the need for prevention programs such as the FIFA 11+ Kids in youth soccer programs. These findings are consistent with a wealth of research showing that prevention programs work and can be easily implemented in less than 15 minutes. In this study, the coaches used the program just twice a week and saw benefits, suggesting that coaches do not need to completely abolish their existing warm-up programs. While we often focus on high school and college athletes, it’s reassuring to see these programs working for elementary and middle school players.

    Clinical implications

    Medical professionals should encourage youth coaches to use injury prevention warm-up programs, such as FIFA 11+ Kids, to reduce injuries at this level and promote positive future health outcomes.

    Questions for discussion

    What is the best way to distribute this information to the youth leagues? Does your youth athlete perform a structured warm-up? Do you think this is easy to implement?

    related posts

    1. Injuries = lost time AND money. Why not prevent injuries with the 11+ Kids program?
    2. 11+ Kids program prevents serious injuries
    3. FIFA 11…(but actually FIFA 11+) programs are effective in reducing football injuries
    4. An ounce of prevention = money saved!
    5. FIFA 11+ reduces the risk of injuries for football players
    6. FIFA 11+ improves performance and reduces injuries in football

    Written by: Jane McDevitt
    Review by: Jeffrey Driban

    ACL EBP CEUs

    Source link

  • The number of children hospitalized for e-scooter injuries increases between 2011 and 2020

    The number of children hospitalized for e-scooter injuries increases between 2011 and 2020

    Upright electric scooters, commonly referred to as e-scooters, have grown in popularity across the country over the past decade. According to a new research summary presented at the 2022 American Academy of Pediatrics National Conference & Exhibition, e-scooter injuries are becoming much more common and increasingly serious.

    Authors of the abstract “National Trends in Pediatric e-Scooter Injury” found hundreds of e-scooter injuries between 2011 and 2020. Patient hospitalizations have increased from less than 1 in 20 e-scooter injuries in 2011 to 1 in 8 requiring hospitalization for care in 2020.

    “The number of annual e-scooter injuries increased between 2011 and 2020, likely in part due to the rising popularity of e-scooter ride-sharing apps,” said lead author Harrison Hayward, MD, Emergency Medicine fellow at Children’s National Hospital. “Our research has characterized the spectrum of injuries that occur in children, allowing emergency physicians to prepare to care for them and parents and families to practice better safety.”

    Researchers examined a national database of e-scooter injuries to children seen in the emergency departments of more than 100 U.S. hospitals between 2011 and 2020 to find out what types of injuries children suffered and if there were any trends. More than 10% of all patients had head injuries, including concussion, skull fractures and internal bleeding. The most common injuries were arm fractures (27%), followed by minor abrasions (22%) and cuts requiring stitches (17%). The mean age was 11.1 years and 59% of patients were male. Hospital admissions increased from 4.2% in 2011 to 12.9% in 2020.

    “Parents whose children ride e-scooters need to know how best to be safe. That’s why helmets are a must, as more than 10% of reported cases involved head injuries,” said Dr. Hayward. “Children should absolutely wear helmets when riding an e-scooter. Research has broadly shown that helmets save the lives of cyclists, and we should think the same way about e-scooters.”

    The authors received no financial support for this research.

    Source link

  • Coach the coach, make ACL injury prevention programs stick!

    Coach the coach, make ACL injury prevention programs stick!

    Coach training improves adherence to anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention programs: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine

    Ling, Daphne I; Boyle, Caroline; Schneider, Brandon; Janosky, Joseph; Childservant, James; Marx, Robert G. Clin J Sport Med. July 2022 – Part 32 – Number 4 – p. 348-354. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000936

    Free article freely available

    Take home message

    Coaches who received education about anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury prevention were more likely to include it in their warm-up. Personal training sessions increased the use of proper alignment cues and the incorporation of a complete prevention program.

    Background

    Neuromuscular training programs can reduce an athlete’s chance of an ACL injury and can be incorporated as a simple warm-up. However, few coaches use warm-up programs for injury prevention.

    Study aim

    Ling and colleagues completed a cluster randomized controlled trial to investigate whether live educational training for coaches with take-home documents led to better adherence to a neuromuscular training program for their teams than coaches who only received program information via email received.

    Methods

    The authors recruited coaches via email to athletic directors at high schools with which the authors’ institution had ties. The authors excluded schools that had previously implemented a neuromuscular training warm-up program. High schools interested in participating in the study were randomized to receive live education for coaches with reference documents or educational documents only. Coaches from schools randomized to the intervention attended a live education session and received a reference video and follow-up documents for a series of neuromuscular training warm-up routines (beginner to elite) containing 7-10 exercises. Coaches from schools in the control group only received the documents in an email. Trained data collectors observed all teams 2-3 times per week during both practices and games. They checked that the coaches performed the neuromuscular training exercises, provided instructions on the correct execution and gave the correct instructions for the technique.

    Results

    The authors randomized 8 high schools, including 21 teams. Over two seasons, the data collectors observed 399 practices or games and 2,579 practices. Coaches in the intervention group used ~7 exercises per session, while coaches in the control group used only ~6 exercises. More coaches in the intervention completed a full neuromuscular training warm-up program and provided prompts to correct incorrect techniques than coaches who only received the documents.

    Viewpoints

    As I suspect, the findings of this study support training coaches on proper techniques and drills in a live format. The authors used a combination of lectures and practical skills training during a 1-hour teaching session. Completing this educational session allowed coaches to ask questions, gain clarity and better understand the need to implement the program properly throughout the season. Having data collectors on site regularly throughout the seasons may have made coaches more compliant. However, coaches did not know when the data collectors would be present, making the data valid because coaches did not perform the prevention exercises in a performative manner only because they believed they were being watched. It would be interesting to see if this educational session could help coaches in more high schools and if other teachers could effectively deliver this educational session.

    Clinical implications

    Clinicians should organize educational workshops for coaches to help them implement proven ACL injury prevention programs as part of their warm-up routine. These workshops can be provided by the physician, another local health care professional, or a coach with experience using these programs.

    Questions for discussion

    Would the implementation of exercises be higher if coaches could choose from a group of useful exercises for their team, thereby increasing “buy-in”?

    Would governing bodies that approve programs and recommend training of coaches in these programs specific to their sport increase adherence and appropriate implementation or discourage participation?

    Written by Shelly Fetchen DiCesaro
    Reviewed by Jeffrey Driban

    related posts

    Sports injury prevention programs increase a player’s fortunes
    Back-to-school injury prevention programs
    Forget about 7 minutes of Abs. What about the 10-minute lower extremity injury prevention program?

    ACL EBP CEUs

    Source link

  • Sports such as football and basketball are better for the bone health of young athletes than running alone

    Sports such as football and basketball are better for the bone health of young athletes than running alone

    Young athletes who participate in multi-directional sports, rather than specializing in a uni-directional sport like running, can build stronger bones that may be at less risk of bone injuries as adults, according to a new study from researchers at Indiana University.

    The study, published in the American College of Sports Medicine’s Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, examined Division I and II female cross-country runners, who often suffer from bone stress injuries such as stress fractures. The researchers found that athletes who ran at a younger age and participated in sports that require movement in many directions – such as basketball or football – had better bone structure and strength than those who only walked, swam or cycled.

    As a result, the study’s findings support recommendations that athletes delay specialization in running and practice multi-directional sports when they are younger, to build a more robust skeleton – and possibly prevent bone stress injuries.

    “Our data shows that playing multi-directional sports at a younger age rather than specializing in one sport, such as running, reduces a person’s risk of bone injuries by developing a larger, stronger skeleton,” said Stuart Warden, associate dean for research and Chancellor’s Professor at the IU School. of Health and Human Sciences at IUPUI. “There is a common misconception that children need to specialize in a single sport to succeed at the next level. However, recent data indicate that athletes who specialize at a young age are at greater risk of an overuse injury and are less likely to progress to another sport. higher levels of competition.”

    Historically, Warden said, researchers have examined bone mass — how much bone a person has — to determine how healthy their skeleton will be throughout life. But in previous studies, Warden and his colleagues found that as a person ages, both mass and size are equally important.

    In the current study, the researchers used high-resolution imaging to assess the tibia near the ankle and the bones in the feet, where bone strain injuries are common in runners. They found that the athletes who participated in both running and multi-directional sports at a younger age had 10 to 20 percent more bone strength than athletes who only ran.

    “Our research shows that the runners who participated in multi-directional sports at a younger age had stronger bones than collegiate athletes, putting them at lower risk for bone stress injuries, including stress fractures,” Warden said. “We want to ensure that people have better, stronger bones as they grow, become adolescents and go through life. If they specialize in one sport at too young an age, they are more likely to get injured and not make it to collegiate and professional level.”

    Warden said anyone supervising a junior athlete or team — whether parents, coaches or trainers — should think twice about forcing them to specialize in one area too early. To allow for proper growth and development, he recommends that young athletes not specialize until their freshman year of high school. For athletes who already play multi-directional sports, he said it’s important that they take time off during the year for rest and recovery, which can improve both bone strength and performance.

    Other authors of the study included Austin Sventeckis, Ph.D. student, and Robyn Fuchs, associate professor, from the IU School of Health and Human Sciences at IUPUI, and Rachel Surowiec from the School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI.

    Source link

  • Sports such as football and basketball are better for the bone health of young athletes than running alone

    Sports such as football and basketball are better for the bone health of young athletes than running alone

    Young athletes who participate in multi-directional sports, rather than specializing in a uni-directional sport like running, can build stronger bones that may be at less risk of bone injuries as adults, according to a new study from researchers at Indiana University.

    The study, published in the American College of Sports Medicine’s Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, examined Division I and II female cross-country runners, who often suffer from bone stress injuries such as stress fractures. The researchers found that athletes who ran at a younger age and participated in sports that require movement in many directions – such as basketball or football – had better bone structure and strength than those who only walked, swam or cycled.

    As a result, the study’s findings support recommendations that athletes delay specialization in running and practice multi-directional sports when they are younger, to build a more robust skeleton – and possibly prevent bone stress injuries.

    “Our data shows that playing multi-directional sports at a younger age rather than specializing in one sport, such as running, reduces a person’s risk of bone injuries by developing a larger, stronger skeleton,” said Stuart Warden, associate dean for research and Chancellor’s Professor at the IU School. of Health and Human Sciences at IUPUI. “There is a common misconception that children need to specialize in a single sport to succeed at the next level. However, recent data indicate that athletes who specialize at a young age are at greater risk of an overuse injury and are less likely to progress to another sport. higher levels of competition.”

    Historically, Warden said, researchers have examined bone mass — how much bone a person has — to determine how healthy their skeleton will be throughout life. But in previous studies, Warden and his colleagues found that as a person ages, both mass and size are equally important.

    In the current study, the researchers used high-resolution imaging to assess the tibia near the ankle and the bones in the feet, where bone strain injuries are common in runners. They found that the athletes who participated in both running and multi-directional sports at a younger age had 10 to 20 percent more bone strength than athletes who only ran.

    “Our research shows that the runners who participated in multi-directional sports at a young age had stronger bones than collegiate athletes, putting them at lower risk for bone stress injuries, including stress fractures,” Warden said. “We want to ensure that people have better, stronger bones as they grow, become adolescents and go through life. If they specialize in one sport at too young an age, they are more likely to get injured and not make it to collegiate and professional level.”

    Warden said anyone supervising a junior athlete or team — whether parents, coaches or trainers — should think twice about forcing them to specialize in one area too early. To allow for proper growth and development, he recommends that young athletes not specialize until their freshman year of high school. For athletes who already play multi-directional sports, he said it’s important that they take time off during the year for rest and recovery, which can improve both bone strength and performance.

    Other authors of the study included Austin Sventeckis, Ph.D. student, and Robyn Fuchs, associate professor, from the IU School of Health and Human Sciences at IUPUI, and Rachel Surowiec from the School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI.

    Source link

  • Freedom in shoes – Shoe types have little to no effect on the number of injuries

    Freedom in shoes – Shoe types have little to no effect on the number of injuries

    Running shoes to prevent running injuries to the lower extremities in adults

    Relph N, Greaves H, Armstrong R, Prior TD, Spencer S, Griffiths IB, Dey P, Langley B. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. August 2022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013368.pub2.
    https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013368.pub2/full

    Take home message

    Prescribing running shoes based on foot type and general footwear type (e.g., motion control, neutral, stability, minimalist) does not reduce the number of lower extremity running injuries.

    Background

    Most running injuries occur in the lower extremities and 20-80% of runners sustain an injury. To reduce the risk of injury, runners are often prescribed specific shoes based on their foot type, based on the idea that the shoe can optimize foot position while running. However, it remains unclear whether running shoes prevent injuries.

    Study aim

    The authors conducted a systematic review to assess whether running shoes prevent lower extremity injuries in different adult runners.

    Methods

    Authors identified randomized (or quasi-randomized) controlled trials among runners (entry to elite level) or military personnel that compared running shoes or studied prescription running shoes based on foot type versus non-prescription shoes. The main outcomes were the number of runners who sustained a lower extremity running injury and the number of lower extremity running injuries. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction with the footwear, side effects (such as blisters) and anyone requiring hospitalization or surgery. The authors found twelve studies that met the inclusion criteria, leading to a total analysis of 11,240 runners.

    Results

    The types of shoes used were 1) neutral/cushioned (intended to reduce footfall stress), 2) motion control (intended to reduce foot movement during stance), 3) stability (provides motion control and cushioning), and 4) minimalist (intended to simulate barefoot running with small aids). The authors found no clear differences in injuries between 1) neutral/cushioned and minimalist shoes (5 studies, 766 participants), 2) motion control and neutral/cushioned shoes (2 studies, 421 participants), and 3) soft and hard shoes (2). studies, 1,095 participants). However, the authors found evidence that runners with a body weight of more than 71.4 kg had a greater risk of injury when wearing minimalist shoes instead of neutral/cushioned shoes. Runners wearing prescription (based on foot structure) or non-prescription shoes had similar injury rates, with moderate certainty (3 studies, 7,203 participants). Runners had similar shoe satisfaction between neutral and minimalist shoes.

    Viewpoints

    Overall, running shoes may not change runners’ risk for lower extremity running injuries. However, pronators reported pain when wearing motion control shoes compared to neutral or stability shoes, and runners with neutral feet reported more pain in motion control shoes than in neutral shoes. These findings were based on a low level of evidence and may be due to the fact that each study used different definitions of shoe types. However, we must interpret all results with caution due to the small sample size. Furthermore, the participants were recreational runners and military personnel. Running shoe researchers should have standard definitions for types of shoes, and large-scale studies are needed to understand whether prescribing running shoes based on foot structure and type can reduce running injuries to the lower extremities.

    Clinical implicationS

    Despite common advertising and beliefs, doctors should explain to runners that specific running shoes cannot reduce injuries. It may be more helpful to advocate that runners purchase comfortable running shoes.

    Questions for discussion

    What kind of advice have you given athletes looking for running shoes? Have you familiarized yourself with shoe types in order to provide advice?

    related posts

    1. Dampen the blow: Softer midsole shoes reduce the risk of injury for recreational runners
    2. What shoes protect those who protect us?
    3. Pronated and Neutral wins the race… or at least keeps the runners in it

    Written by Jennifer Xu
    Reviewed by Jeffrey Driban

    Source link

  • New research shows a better way to easily assess knee muscle function

    New research shows a better way to easily assess knee muscle function

    Muscle strength and its improvement are important for everyone for their daily activities. Conventionally, muscle function can be assessed through physical performance tests and/or muscle strength measurements. However, these methods are not applicable to people who cannot undergo forceful muscle contractions, such as infants, the elderly, and patients with injuries or cognitive impairment (such as dementia).

    A simple and popular alternative is the use of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), which can quickly and non-invasively measure tissue resistance (which depends on the amount of water and electrolytes present in the tissue) and reactance (which depends on the integrity of the cell) can be measured. membrane). Phase angle (PhA), a measurement derived via BIA, is calculated using the resistance and reactance of the tissue. It is directly proportional to muscle cell mass and function. Many studies have linked PhA across the body to maximal muscle strength, but none associate PhA with knee extension strength or explosive muscle strength (the force required to make fast, powerful movements such as sprinting or standing up from a chair) in adults. Taking into account the importance of knee muscle strength – especially in the elderly, who need it for their independence, and athletes, who need strong knees for better performance – such a study was necessary.

    In this spirit, a group of scientists, including Professor Ryota Akagi, from the College of Systems Engineering and Science, Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT); Assistant Professor Kosuke Hirata from the Faculty of Sports Sciences, Waseda University; and researchers Yosuke Yamada and Tsukasa Yoshida from the Healthy Longevity Research Section, National Institute of Health and Nutrition, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition examined the association of PhA with the neuromuscular properties of knee extensor muscles in both young and older people. adults. Their findings were published in Part 13 of Frontiers in physiology on August 11, 2022. Dr. Akagi and Dr. Hirata, the corresponding authors of the paper, tell us: “We wanted to assess the association of PhA in the thigh with maximal muscle strength, explosive muscle strength, contractile properties and neuromuscular activity. and find out which of the two – whole body PhA or the thigh – was a better predictor of knee extensor strength.

    The team measured the PhA of the whole body and thighs of 55 participants (23 young men and 32 older men) at 50 kHz. Participants were asked to perform a 4-second maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) to measure peak torque (PT).MVIC) and a 1 second MVIC to measure the rate of torque development (RTD) over a time difference of 0-200 milliseconds. The average mean value of these three measurements (i.e. PTMVIC and RTD) was used for further analysis. Contractile properties were also analyzed because they are significant markers of the mechanisms underlying force generation in the muscles. Finally, muscle activity was assessed by electromyography (EMG-RMS).

    The study findings showed that both whole-body and thigh PhAs are associated with knee extensor muscle strength (with thigh PhA being the preferred predictor of knee extensor strength). However, this association was thought to be due to the contractile properties of the muscles and not to neural aspects. Thus, both measures could not predict neuromuscular activity or explosive muscle strength (which largely depends on neuromuscular control) of knee extensors.

    This study is promising for current and future implications. Speaking of the present, being able to assess knee muscle strength is very important, especially for the elderly (where strong knee muscles mean greater independence in movement) and athletes (who need to maintain knee muscle strength to perform better ). . The above findings demonstrate a new way to assess muscle strength not only for healthy adults, but also for people suffering from orthopedic or cognitive disorders. And speaking about the future, Dr. Akagi shows us the implications of their work: “People can assess their muscle condition in just a few seconds using BIA. In the future, we may be able to build a system that uses a person’s BIA to provide them with advice to promote their health.”

    Source link

  • Who participates in youth sports?

    Who participates in youth sports?

    Organized sports participation among children aged 6–17 years: United States, 2020

    Black LI, Terlizzi EP, Vahratian A. National Center for Health Statistics (US). Publication date: 08/11/2022. Series: data overview; No. 441

    https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/119026

    Take home message

    Sports participation was lower among racial and ethnic minority children, children whose parents had lower education or income, children living in counties with greater social vulnerability, and children living in the southern United States.

    Background

    Youth participation in sports is associated with better physical fitness and mental health. Understanding the differences in sports participation can help inform strategies to promote active lifestyles among children and adolescents, which positively impacts their physical and mental health.

    Study aim

    Black and colleagues completed an analysis of data from the 2020 National Health Interview Survey to describe disparities in sports participation in the United States.

    Methods

    The authors analyzed data from the 2020 National Health Interview Survey. This survey is a nationally representative household survey conducted throughout the year. Parents reported whether their child participated in a sports team or club or took sports lessons at school or in the community in the previous 12 months. The authors then collected data on household income as a percentage of the federal poverty level, race and Hispanic origin, geographic region (Northeast US, Midwest US, Southern US, or Western US), social vulnerability of a county, and urbanicity ( urban region). -national classification) of a province.

    Results

    About half (54%) of children aged 6 to 17 have played sports in the past twelve months (boys: 56%; girls: 52%). The authors reported: “Participation levels were lower among children from racial and ethnic minority groups, children whose parents had lower levels of education and family income, children living in counties with greater social vulnerability, and children living in the South.”

    Black Graph

    Viewpoints

    The results of this letter provide a surprising snapshot of sports participation in the United States. While it is established that early sports participation can have a positive impact on an individual, significant differences still exist. These findings indicate that sports participation is strongly associated with socioeconomic status. Ultimately, a higher socio-economic status can ensure children’s access to sports. This is particularly reflected in the fact that lower parental education, lower parental income and lower geographical area of ​​social vulnerability are all associated with lower participation. These findings complement data from the Athletic Training Locations and Services Database, which shows that these communities also have less access to athletic training services.

    This data provided a unique snapshot of 2020, when many sports shut down in the spring due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey asked about sports participation over the past year, so it is unclear whether the pandemic could influence these results. Furthermore, not every community is recovering from the pandemic in the same way. The authors acknowledge that it will be essential to replicate these analyzes with data from the 2022 survey to better understand patterns of sports participation after many of the restrictions associated with the pandemic are relaxed/removed.

    Clinical implications

    Sports medicine professionals should advocate for increased access to sports through local recreation organizations, schools, and other organizations. In regions with high social vulnerability, we should encourage policymakers that investments in youth sports and physical activity can help improve community health.

    Questions for discussion

    What can we do as doctors to positively influence participation in team sports?

    Written by: Kyle Harris
    Review by: Jeffrey Driban

    related posts

    Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology Consensus Recommendations for Pre-Participation Screening in Young Competitive Athletes
    A lasting impression: youth sports participation and healthy habits as adults
    Previous participation in collision sports is associated with reduced quality of life
    Lower socioeconomic status is associated with less access to athletic training services

    9 EBP CEU courses

    Source link

  • Tennis Elbow: What It Is and How to Treat It |  Foothills Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine

    Tennis Elbow: What It Is and How to Treat It | Foothills Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine

    by Adam Halseth PT, DPT, SCS | Northeast Scottsdale

    Tennis elbow or golfer’s elbow is an uncommon condition. It just has an impact about 1 to 3 percent of adults every year. But your chances of developing it increase as you get older. Although the name suggests it is a condition exclusive to these sports, it is possible to develop tennis or golfer’s elbow even if you have never played either game in your life.

    Below you will find important information about this painful condition, including why it occurs, how to determine if you have the condition, and what treatment options are available.

    Young woman experiencing pain while exercising in a gym.

    Understanding tennis/golfer’s elbow

    Tennis/golfer’s elbow is one of the most common causes of elbow pain. It is often persistent and painful enough to warrant physical therapy and/or a doctor’s visit. This condition occurs when the tendons that connect your forearm to the outside of the elbow bone become swollen and inflamed.

    If this happens, it can lead to microscopic tears in the muscles and tendons. These tears can cause a lot of pain, even though they are very small.

    Usually people don’t experience these symptoms unless they do a lot of repetitive movements. While the general population is not highly likely to experience this pain, as many as half of all players will experience it at some point in their lives.

    What causes tennis/golfer’s elbow?

    If you’re wondering what the causes are, the answer is: a lot of things! As mentioned, tennis/golfer’s elbow usually occurs as a result of repetitive movements of the elbow joint. Besides tennis and golf, some other activities that can lead to elbow pain and discomfort include:

    • Screens
    • Squash
    • Weightlifting
    • Racketball
    • Rake
    • Typing
    • To paint
    • Carpentry
    • To knit
    • Gardening
    • Swimming

    Did some of the items in the list above surprise you? Fortunately, there are things you can do to reduce the chance of developing elbow pain or minimize symptoms if you already have it. Keep reading to learn more.

    Man with elbow pain while playing tennis

    5 Symptoms of tennis/golfer’s elbow

    Are you experiencing elbow pain that makes you wonder if you have tennis/golfer’s elbow or something else? Although a doctor or therapist should be consulted to make the most accurate diagnosis, these are five common symptoms:

    1. Discomfort when you lift something
    2. Weakness in your hand or forearm when making a fist or grabbing something
    3. Recurring pain just below the bend in your elbow (on the outside of your forearm)
    4. Pain that radiates from the elbow to the wrist
    5. Discomfort when turning the forearm (for example, when opening a jar or a door)

    As you can see, the primary symptom is pain in the elbow area. Conditions that mimic tennis elbow include:

    • Radiocapitellar arthritis
    • Osteochondritis dissecans
    • Intra-articular plica
    • Rotational instability

    A visit to your PT can help rule out these conditions if you are unsure whether you have tennis/golfer’s elbow or another condition.

    FH Shin Splits Blog 1

    Prevention techniques

    The best way to prevent developing this condition is to avoid doing repetitive movements too often. If you play a sport or other activity that requires repetitive use of your arm and muscles, make sure you take regular breaks. Stretch the muscles of your arms during your breaks.

    It is also important to warm up the muscles of your arms before doing any physical activity that requires the use of your elbows and/or arms. When the muscles are warm, they can stretch and contract more easily without causing injury.

    Once you’ve finished a sporting event or workout and stretched your arm muscles, consider applying ice to your elbows if you feel heat or inflammation in those areas. If you already have symptoms of tennis elbow despite your best efforts, consider getting physical therapy.

    Physiotherapy treatment options

    Physical therapy can help improve the flexibility and strength of your forearm muscles, making you less likely to develop tennis elbow. Physical therapy can also facilitate healing and reduce pain by stimulating blood flow to the affected tendons and muscles. Blood contains oxygen, which the muscles need to heal and function optimally.

    Six common physical therapy treatment options recommended for tennis elbow:

    1. Muscle stimulation
    2. Ultrasound
    3. Ice massage
    4. Braces and tape to support the affected area
    5. Specialized stretches and exercises
    6. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

    During your recovery from tennis/golfer’s elbow, it is important not to rush things. If you push your body before it is ready and your condition has healed enough, you can set yourself back. Before returning to your previous activity level, make sure that you can grasp objects without pain and that your elbow no longer looks or feels swollen. When you can bend and move your affected elbow without difficulty or discomfort, you can resume your normal activities.

    Get your quality of life back

    If you are ready to get your life back and fully recover from the symptoms of your tennis/golfer’s elbow, we are here to help. Contact Foothills Sports Medicine Physical Therapy today request your appointment.

    Source link